Maskulinitas Rapuh di TikTok: Representasi Emosi Lelaki dalam Budaya Siber Gen Z
Fragile Masculinity on TikTok: Representations of Men's Emotions in Gen Z's Cyber Culture
Abstract views: 34
,
PDF downloads: 18
Abstract
The emergence of “fragile masculinity” among Gen Z males on TikTok marks a significant cultural shift in emotional expression within digital spaces. This phenomenon is not merely a reflection of personal sentiment but embodies a complex interplay of platform affordances, algorithmic visibility, and symbolic gender performance. This study investigates how emotional expressions by young men on TikTok operate as performative acts influenced by platform logic and techno-cultural norms, contributing to the reconfiguration of digital masculinity.Using a qualitative multimodal content analysis of 30 TikTok videos tagged with emotional labels (e.g., #sadboy, #overthinker), this research integrates discourse analysis, visual semiotics, and user engagement metrics. Findings reveal three key dynamics: (1) emotional performativity is constructed through audiovisual aesthetics and shaped by algorithmic preferences; (2) vulnerability operates as both emotional capital and branding strategy; (3) validation mechanisms embedded in the platform incentivize the commodification of emotional expression.This study underscores how algorithmic governance shapes affective expression and generates gendered visibility. TikTok functions not only as a social media space but as an ideological arena where masculinity is rearticulated through stylized vulnerability. While this challenges traditional hegemonic norms, it also imposes emotional standards dictated by virality and platform capitalism.
Downloads
References
Banet-Weiser, S. (2018). Empowered: Popular feminism and popular misogyny. Feminist Media Studies, 18(2), 148–160.
Baumann, J., Prieur, L., & Boellstorff, T. (2025). Emotional governance and digital subjectivity on social platforms. Journal of Platform Studies, 3(2), 133–150.
Bishop, S. (2022). Affective platforms and melancholic masculinity: The algorithmic aesthetics of sadness. Media, Culture & Society, 44(6), 1012–1029.
Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859.
Conti, G., Ortega, M., & Velasquez, A. (2024). Emotional commodification in platformed masculinities: TikTok, sad boys, and the market of vulnerability. Information, Communication & Society, 27(2), 203–220.
Desoutter, M. (2025). War, social media and gender: An analysis of the use of TikTok by Ukrainian soldiers. Critical Military Studies. Advance online publication.
Dhoest, A. (2025). From manosphere to mainstream: Representations of masculinity on TikTok. International Journal of Communication, 19, 24706.
Dobson, A. S. (2021). Postfeminism and the visibility of young women on social media. Feminist Media Studies, 21(1), 13–30.
Duffy, B. E., Hund, E., & Tran, M. (2022). Sad girls and aesthetic labor: The gendered politics of emotional branding. Social Media + Society, 8(1), 1–12.
Felaco, F. (2025). Platformised identities and visual affect: Reading male sadness on TikTok. New Media & Society. Advance online publication.
Fitriyani, A., Saputra, E., & Haris, R. (2025). Performing vulnerability: Masculinity, TikTok, and the Indonesian digital youth. Journal of Youth Studies, 28(4), 415–430.
Gerrard, Y., & Thornham, H. (2022). Emotion as identity: Self-labelling and affective communities on TikTok. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 25(3), 345–362.
Gill, R. (2023). Affective confessions: Digital intimacy and emotional work on social platforms. Theory, Culture & Society, 40(1), 1–22.
Haslop, C., Lury, C., & Moore, S. (2024). Masculinity as algorithm: TikTok and the logic of affect visibility. Media, Culture & Society, 46(1), 89–105.
Kress, G. (2021). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Lott, K., Murumaa-Mengel, M., & Marling, R. (2025). Mainstreaming the manosphere: Discourses of contemporary masculinity among Estonian manfluencers. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 184.
Mavroudi, A., & Abidin, C. (2023). Affective publics on TikTok: Emotional connectivity and platform logic. Social Media + Society, 9(1), 1–12.
Papacharissi, Z. (2021). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.
Scarcelli, C. M., & Farci, M. (2024). Gender, digital youth cultures and popularity. Journal of Gender Studies. Advance online publication.
Tanner, S., & Gillardin, F. (2025). Toxic communication on TikTok: Sigma masculinities and gendered disinformation. Social Media + Society, 11(1), 1–12.Verma, M., Li, S., & Chua, T. (2023). Emotions and attention economy in TikTok influencer culture. International Journal of Communication, 17, 2239–2262.
Zulli, D., & Zulli, P. (2024). Platformed sadness: The case of emotional TikToks and the affordances of viral vulnerability. Social Media + Society, 10(1), 1–12.
Vinopal, Lauren. (2022). The Rise of #PainTok: Sad Selfies for You and Your Boys. Mel Magazine. Diakses 24 Agustus 2025.
Copyright (c) 2025 GHANCARAN: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Ghancaran: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia uses an Open Access Policy under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors publishing in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Ghancaran Journal holds the copyright and grants the journal rights for first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a
The work is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which allows others to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any media or format and adapt, remix, change, and develop the material even for commercial purposes, as long as it is stated credit and license derivative works under similar terms. - Authors may make additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published work version.
- Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their websites) before and during submission, as doing so may lead to productive exchange.
