Penilaian Autentik Pada Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di Sekolah Dasar Karesidenan Madiun

V. Teguh  Suharto; Dwi Setiyadi; Nur Samsiyah; Fuad  Zakiawan

doi:10.19105/ghancaran.vi.21661

V. Teguh Suharto Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Universitas PGRI Madiun
Dwi Setiyadi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas PGRI Madiun
Nur Samsiyah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas PGRI Madiun
Fuad Zakiawan Pascasarjana IPS, Universitas PGRI Madiun

https://doi.org/10.19105/ghancaran.vi.21661

Abstract views: 49 ,

PDF downloads: 20

Keywords: Authentic assessment, Indonesian language, Elementary schools

Abstract

The objective of this research is to clarify the implementation of authentic assessment for Bahasa Indonesia subjects at elementary schools throughout the residency of Madiun in the last five years. This research was carried out under a qualitative-descriptive approach which applied interviews, observation, and documentation for the data collecting techniques. The results of the analysis showed that authentic assessment, in the phase of diagnostic, formative, or summative testing, was fitted to the policy of 2013 and the Merdeka Curriculum. Reasons found for it were that all types of evaluations had to be relevant with varieties of evaluation object characteristics, ie observation techniques because the evaluation objects are in the forms of observable performance and actions; paper and pencil tests were used to measure the student's'' knowledge; and interviewing was used only when something was suspicious in the students' learning process. A diagnostic test was carried out at the beginning of learning through interviews, student achievement report, and so forth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achmad, G. H., Ratnasari, D., Amin, A., Yuliani, E., & Liandara, N. (2022). Pembuatan Media Video Pembelajaran Fisika SMA. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(4), 5685–5699.

Anggreaena, Ginanto, Felicia, Andiarti, Herutami, Alhapip, Iswoyo, hartini, M. (2022). Panduan Pembelajaran dan Asesmen. Badan Standar, Kurikulum, Dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, Dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia, 123.

Arends, R., & Kilcher, A. (2010). Teaching for student learning. Routledge New York.

Aulia, R. N., Rahmawati, R., & Permana, D. (2020). Peranan penting evaluasi pembelajaran bahasa di sekolah dasar [The important role of language learning evaluation in primary schools]. Jurnal BELAINDIKA (Pembelajaran Dan Inovasi Pendidikan), 2(1), 1–9.

Azim, S., & Khan, M. (2012). Authentic assessment: An instructional tool to enhance students learning. Academic Research International, 2(3), 314.

BAI, P. D. G. (2020). Pelaksanaan Penilaian Autentik Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Kajian: Ontologi, Epistimologi, Dan Aksiologi. Basastra, 9(1), 35–46.

Clemmens, D. (2003). Adolescent motherhood: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 28(2), 93–99.

Daryanto, D. (2014). Pendekatan pembelajaran saintifik Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Davis, M. H., & Ponnamperuma, G. G. (2005). Portfolio assessment. Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Volume 5: Water Pollution, 32(3), 279–284.

Earl, L. M. (2012). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Corwin Press.

Enriquez, M. A. S. (2014). Students’ Perceptions on the Effectiveness of the Use of Edmodo as a Supplementary Tool for Learning. DLSU Research Congress, 2(6), 1–6.

Feuer, M. J., & Fulton, K. (1993). The many faces of performance assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 74(6), 478.

Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18–26.

Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L. (2006). Relations Between Student Perceptions of Assessment Authenticity, Study Approaches and Learning Outcome. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32(4), 381–400.

Gulo, Y. (2000). Analisis efek luas pengungkapan sukarela dalam laporan tahunan terhadap cost of equity capital perusahaan. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 2(1), 45–62.

Herman, J. L. (1992). A practical guide to alternative assessment. ERIC.

Hu, J., & Liu, Y. (2023). The Scientific Basis of Authentic Assessment and Its Implementation in English as a Foreign Language Education. SHS Web of Conferences, 174, 01023.

Iftakhar, S. (2016). Google classroom: what works and how. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 3(1), 12–18.

Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it’s here to stay. Corwin Press.

Joy Cumming, J., & Maxwell, G. S. (1999). Contextualising authentic assessment. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 177–194.

Kemdikbud. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi No 21 Tahun 2022 Tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah. Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Riset Dan Teknologi, 9.

Kepmendikbudristekdikti. (2022). Pedoman penerapan kurikulum dalam rangka pemulihan pembelajaran. Menpendikbudristek, 1–112.

Korucu, A. T., & Alkan, A. (2011). Differences between m-learning (mobile learning) and e-learning, basic terminology and usage of m-learning in education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1925–1930.

Kumar, V., & Nanda, P. (2020). Social media as a tool in higher education: A pedagogical perspective. In Handbook of research on diverse teaching strategies for the technology-rich classroom (pp. 239–253). IGI Global.

Kunandar, K. (2011). Evaluating Program of Curriculum Development and Implementation at School. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 2(2), 78607.

Kurniasih, I., & Sani, B. (2014). Implementasi kurikulum 2013: konsep & penerapan. Kata Pena.

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 107–119.

Miles, M. ., Huberman, M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage Publications.

Mueller, J. A., & Dollaghan, C. (2013). A systematic review of assessments for identifying executive function impairment in adults with acquired brain injury.

Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2017). Effective teaching: Evidence and practice. Sage.

Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful Learning: The Essential Factor for Conceptual Change in Limited or Inappropriate Propositional Hierarchies Leading to Empowerment of Learners. Science Education, 86(4), 548–571.

Nurgiantoro, B. (2018). Penilaian otentik dalam pembelajaran bahasa. UGM PRESS.

Ramadania, F. (2016). Konsep Bahasa Berbasis Teks pada Buku Ajar Kurikulum 2013. STILISTIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 1(2), 224–236.

Rolheiser, C., & Ross, J. A. (2001). Student self-evaluation: What research says and what practice shows. Plain Talk about Kids, 43(57).

Rule, A. C. (State U. of N. Y. A. O. (2006). Editorial: The components Authentic Learning Overview. Journal of Authentic Learning, 3(1), 1–10.

SABTIAWAN, W. B., YUANITA, L., & RAHAYU, Y. S. (2019). Effectiveness of Authentic Assessment: Performances, Attitudes, and Prohibitive Factors. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(2), 156–175.

Sani, R. A. (2022). Penilaian autentik. Bumi Aksara.

Sicat, A. S., & Ed, M. A. (2015). Enhancing college students’ proficiency in business writing via schoology. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(1), 159–178.

So, S. (2016). Mobile instant messaging support for teaching and learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 32–42.

Suwandi, S. (2011). Model-model asesmen dalam pembelajaran. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka.

Ulfatin, N. (2013). Metode Kualitatif di Bidang Pendidikan: Toeri dan Aplikasinya. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.

Widowati, T. (2015). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Otentik Berbasis Scientificliteracy pada Pembelajaran Fisika di SMA sebagai Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. UNS (Sebelas Maret University).