Learning Path EXOOCO-2R Model in E-Module Based Reading and Writing Learning with Formative Assessment Tools

  • Giati Anisah Department of Islamic Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri, Bojonegoro 62115
  • Pramesti Wulandari Department of Islamic Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri, Bojonegoro 62115 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2652-4606
  • Fiyan Ilman Faqih Department of Indonesian Language and Literature Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, Bangkalan 69162
  • Julia Binti Madzalan Department of Language Education, Faculty of Education, Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Selangor, Bandar Seri Putra 43000 Kajang
Abstract views: 0 , PDF downloads: 0
Keywords: E-module, formative assessment, learning path, reading, writing

Abstract

Literacy is the foundation of education; it allows students to understand, evaluate, and communicate information effectively. However, many challenges arise in developing these skills, including limited access to adequate reading materials, ineffective teaching methods, and insufficient support and motivation from the surrounding environment. This research aims to develop a learning path in literacy learning, especially reading-to-write, based on e-modules with formative assessment tools. The development of learning paths in e-module-based reading-to-write learning with formative assessment tools is carried out using the ADDIE development model. This research began with a needs analysis to identify gaps in literacy learning. The e-module design and formative assessment tools are designed to provide a clear structure and continuous feedback to students. Based on the results of the research that has been carried out, it can be seen that the feasibility test results obtained an average value of 95.14%. These results show that the EXOOCO-2R learning path, formulated as an e-module, is considered very suitable for use, and this is in line with students' positive response to the learning path, with 68% included in the good category.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Giati Anisah, Department of Islamic Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri, Bojonegoro 62115

Giati Anisah is a lecturer at the Department of Islamic Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri, Bojonegoro, Indonesia. Her research interests include literacy pedagogy, reading–writing integration, formative assessment, and digital learning innovation in elementary education. She has published several works on curriculum implementation and technology-based instructional models.

Pramesti Wulandari, Department of Islamic Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri, Bojonegoro 62115

PRAMESTI WULANDARI is a lecturer at the Department of Islamic Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri, Bojonegoro, Indonesia. Her academic interests focus on literacy education, curriculum development, instructional design, and technology-enhanced learning in primary education. She has been actively involved in research and development projects related to e-modules, formative assessment, and innovative learning models.

Fiyan Ilman Faqih, Department of Indonesian Language and Literature Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, Bangkalan 69162

FIYAN ILMAN FAQIH is a lecturer in the Department of Indonesian Language and Literature Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, Bangkalan, Indonesia. His academic expertise lies in language education, literacy studies, text analysis, and instructional media development. He is actively engaged in research concerning reading comprehension strategies, writing instruction, and digital learning resources for language teaching.

Julia Binti Madzalan, Department of Language Education, Faculty of Education, Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Selangor, Bandar Seri Putra 43000 Kajang

JULIA BINTI MADZALAN is a lecturer at the Department of Language Education, Faculty of Education, Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Selangor, Kajang, Malaysia. Her research interests include language pedagogy, literacy development, educational assessment, and technology integration in education. She has been involved in cross-institutional academic collaborations focusing on innovative literacy instruction and formative assessment practices.

References

Abdel Latif, M. M. M. (2021). Remodeling Writers’ Composing Processes: Implications for Writing Assessment. Assessing Writing, 50, 100547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100547

Al-Muhaideb, S., & Menai, M. E. B. (2011). Evolutionary Computation Approaches to the Curriculum Sequencing Problem. Natural Computing, 10(2), 891–920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11047-010-9246-5

Apriani, M. F., & Yulikifli. (2021). Preliminary Study of Physics E-Module Development Using Research-Based Learning Model Through Smartphone to Support Digital Learning in the Revolutionary 4.0. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1876(1), 0–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1876/1/012042

Astalini, D., Kurniawan, W., Anwar, K., & Kurniawan, D. A. (2019). Effectiveness of Using E-module and E-assessment. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 13(9), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i09.11016

Badan Standar Krikulum dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kemendikbud. (2022). Capaian Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Fase A-F. Jakarta: Badan Standar Krikulum dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kemendikbud.

Barrouillet, P. (2015). Theories of Cognitive Development: From Piaget to Today. Developmental Review, 38, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2015.07.004

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. New York: Springer.

Chang, P., Tsai, C.-C., & Chen, P. (2020). Organization Strategies in EFL Expository Essays in a Content-Based Language Learning Course. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(2), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00464-2

Dalaila, I., Widiyaningrum, P., & Saptono, S. (2022). Developing E-Module Based on Socio-Scientific Issues to Improve Students Scientific Literacy. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 11(3), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v10i1.54500

Daud, A., Linda, R., Harfal, Z., Nabila, O., Suryani, A., & Tahirah, Z. (2024). Multimodal Text-Powered Interactive E-Module for Enhancing English Structure Learning. Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 6(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v6i1.15988

Davy Tsz Kit, N. G., Luo, W., Chan, H. M. Y., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022). Using Digital Story Writing as a Pedagogy to Develop AI Literacy Among Primary Students. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3(February), 100054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100054

Du, W., Kim, Z., Raheja, V., Kumar, D., & Kang, D. (2022). Read, Revise, Repeat: A System Demonstration for Human-in-the-loop Iterative Text Revision. ArXiv, abs/2204.0. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.in2writing-1.14

Duke, N. K., Halvorsen, A. L., Strachan, S. L., Kim, J., & Konstantopoulos, S. (2021). Putting PjBL to the Test: The Impact of Project-Based Learning on Second Graders’ Social Studies and Literacy Learning and Motivation in Low-SES School Settings. American Educational Research Journal, 58(1), 160–200. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831220929638

Dwivedi, P., Kant, V., & Bharadwaj, K. K. (2018). Learning Path Recommendation Based on Modified Variable Length Genetic Algorithm. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 819–836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9637-7

Graham, S., Liu, X., Bartlett, B., Ng, C., Harris, K. R., Aitken, A., … Alukdar, J. (2018). Reading for Writing: A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Reading Interventions on Writing. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 243–284. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317746927

Graham, S. (2020). The Sciences of Reading and Writing Must Become More Fully Integrated. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S35–S44. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.332

Granberg, C., Palm, T., & Palmberg, B. (2021). A Case Study of a Formative Assessment Practice and the Effects on Students’ Self-Regulated Learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 100955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100955

Gustafson, S., Nordström, T., Andersson, U., Fälth, L., & Martin, I. (2019). Effects of a Formative Assessment System on Early Reading Development. Education, 40(1), 17–27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335161113

Gustina, A. R. (2021). Deskripsi Berpikir Kritis Siswa Berdominansi Gaya Belajar Kinertetik pada Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Berstandar Trend International Mathematic And Sains Study (TIMSS) di SMP IT Nurul Ilmi Kota Jambi. Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE), 2(3), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v2i3.219

Harvey, S. (2023). Nonfiction Matters Reading, Writing, and Research in Grades 3-8. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032681849

Hijriani, P. R. (2021). Proses Belajar Anak Usia 0 Sampai 12 Tahun Berdasarkan Karakteristik Perkembangannya. Bunayya: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, 7(1), 152–155. https://doi.org/10.22373/bunayya.v7i1.9295

Irons, A., & Elkington, S. (2021). Enhancing Learning Through Formative Assessment and Feedback. London: Routledge.

Ismaniati, C., & Iskhamdhanah, B. (2023). Development of Interactive E-Modules to Increase Learning Motivation and Science Literacy in Elementary School Students. Jurnal Iqra’ : Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(1), 156–173. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v8i1.2699

Jacob, L., Lachner, A., & Scheiter, K. (2020). Learning by Explaining Orally or in Written Form? Text Complexity Matters. Learning and Instruction, 68, 101344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101344

Jouhar, M. R., & Rupley, W. H. (2021). The Reading–Writing Connection based on Independent Reading and Writing: A Systematic Review. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 37(2), 136–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2020.1740632

Kaynar, N., Sadik, O., & Boichuk, E. (2020). Technology in Early Childhood Education: Electronic Books for Improving Students’ Literacy Skills. TechTrends, 64(6), 911–921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00520-5

Kem, D. D. (2022). Personalised and Adaptive Learning: Emerging Learning Platforms in the Era of Digital and Smart Learning. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 5(2), 385–391. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i2-02

Khoiriyah, S. (2020). Gaya Belajar Kinestetik (Kinestetic Learning) Studi Kasus Siswa pada Kelompok B di Taman Kanak-Kanak (TK) Dharma Wanita Desa Trojalu Kecamatan Baureno Kabupaten Bojonegoro. Undergraduate thesis, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

Kim, Z., Du, W., Raheja, V., Kumar, D., & Kang, D. (2022). Improving Iterative Text Revision by Learning Where to Edit from Other Revision Tasks. ArXiv, abs/2212.0. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.01350

Kulasegaram, K., & Rangachari, P. K. (2018). Beyond “Formative”: Assessments to Enrich Student Learning. Advances in Physiology Education, 42(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00122.2017

Kurniati. (2023). Menulis Teks Observasi Melalui Pembelajaran Kolaboratif Analytic Team Dengan Teknik Identifikasi Objek. Sirok Bastra 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.37671/sb.v11i1.365

Lachner, A., Backfisch, I., Hoogerheide, V., van Gog, T., & Renkl, A. (2020). Timing Matters! Explaining Between Study Phases Enhances Students’ Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 841–853. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000396

Lubis, H. M., Lubis, N. S. I., & Hilmi, N. (2022). Analisis Perkembangan Kognitif Siswa Kelas 6 Mis An-Nur Sukamandi Hilir Pagar Merbau Deli Serdang. PEMA (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat), 2(1), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.56832/pema.v2i1.287

Lyon, C. J., Nabors Oláh, L., & Caroline Wylie, E. (2019). Working Toward Integrated Practice: Understanding the Interaction Among Formative Assessment Strategies. Journal of Educational Research, 112(3), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2018.1514359

Ma’rifatullah, R., Umamah, N., Marjono, Sumardi, & Surya, R. A. (2021). Development of E-Modules Based on Science Technology Society Integrated Life Based Learning in History Learning. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 747(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/747/1/012064

Marinda, L. (2020). Teori Perkembangan Kognitif Jean Piaget dan Problematikanya pada Anak Usia Sekolah Dasar. An-Nisa Jurnal Kajian Perempuan dan Keislaman, 13(1), 116–152. https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v13i1.26

Mudra, H. (2020). Digital Literacy Among Young Learners: How Do EFL Teachers and Learners View Its Benefits and Barriers? Teaching English with Technology, 20(3), 3–24. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1264169

Muhammad, A., Zhou, Q., Beydoun, G., Xu, D., & Shen, J. (2016). Learning Path Adaptation in Online Learning Systems. 2016 IEEE 20th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD), 421–426. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCWD.2016.7566026

Muñoz, J. L. R., Ojeda, F. M., Jurado, D. L. A., Peña, P. F. P., Carranza, C. P. M., Berríos, H. Q., … Vasquez-Pauca, M. J. (2022). Systematic Review of Adaptive Learning Technology for Learning in Higher Education. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2022(98), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2022.98.014

Nabizadeh, A. H., Leal, J. P., Rafsanjani, H. N., & Shah, R. R. (2020). Learning Path Personalization and Recommendation Methods: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art. Expert Systems with Applications, 159, 113596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113596

Ng, M.-K. (2023). Reading for Writing: A Case Study of Multi-Media Presentations of Reading Achievements. In M.-L. Rebecca Leung (Ed.), Chinese Creative Writing Studies (pp. 67–83). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0931-5_6

Ningrum, N. I., & Ambarwati, R. (2022). Development of Flipbook-Based E-Module on Animalia Material as Teaching Material to Train Digital Literacy of Class X High School Students. BioEdu: Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 12(2), 525–538. https://doi.org/10.26740/bioedu.v12n2.p525-538

Nungki, A., & Rachmani, D. N. (2021). Analisis Teori Perkembangan Kognitif Piaget pada Anak Usia 11 Tahun di Brebes. Mathline: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.31943/MATHLINE.V6I1.177

Nurrokhma, D. S. (2021). Strategi Observasi Kritis Untuk Pembelajaran Menulis Teks Laporan Hasil Observasi. Journal of Education and Learning Sciences, 1(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.56404/jels.v1i1.6

Panggabean, R. F. S. B., & Tamba, K. P. (2020). Kesulitan Belajar Matematika: Analisis Pengetahuan Awal [Difficulty in Learning Mathematics: Prior Knowledge Analysis]. JOHME: Journal of Holistic Mathematics Education, 4(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.19166/johme.v4i1.2091

Pradana, M. D., & Uthman, Y. O. O.-O. (2023). Development of Aqidah Akhlak Learning Media “Board Game Based on Education Fun on the Theme of Commendable Morals (E-Fun A2M)” for High School Students. Assyfa Learning Journal, 1(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.61650/alj.v1i1.9

Ramos, D. B., Ramos, I. M. M., Gasparini, I., & de Oliveira, E. H. T. (2021). A New Learning Path Model for E-Learning Systems. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET), 19(2), 34–54. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.20210401.oa2

Scheidegger, A. R. (2020). Incorporating Reflective Writing Into Criminal Justice Courses. Reflective Practice, 21(1), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2020.1712196

Schildkamp, K., van der Kleij, F. M., Heitink, M. C., Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020). Formative Assessment: A Systematic Review of Critical Teacher Prerequisites for Classroom Practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602

Seals, D. R. (2023). Publishing Particulars: Part 2. Tips for Effective Manuscript Development. American Journal of Physiology - Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 324(3), R393–R408. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00267.2022

Sholihah, N. S. N., & Wijayanti, E. (2023). Analysis of VAK Learning Styles of VIII Grade Students in Science. Indonesian Journal of Science and Education, 7(2), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.36418/CERDIKA.V1I2.26

Simonsmeier, B. A., Peiffer, H., Flaig, M., & Schneider, M. (2020). Peer Feedback Improves Students’ Academic Self-Concept in Higher Education. Research in Higher Education, 61(6), 706–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-020-09591-y

Subramanian, V., & Bertolino, A. (2016). Learning Path Specification for Workplace Learning based on Business Process Management. CSEDU (1), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.5220/0005815301720180

Suganda, P. I. (2022). The Use of Digital Media to Improve Students’ Literacy in English Learning in Junior High School. Jurnal of English Development, 2(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.51629/cjls.v3i2.145

Sun, H., & Wang, M. (2022). Effects of Teacher Intervention and Type of Peer Feedback on Student Writing Revision. Language Teaching Research, 0(0), 13621688221080508. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221080507

Suyatna, A. (2020). ICT Learning Media Comparative Studies: Simulation, E-Modules, Videos. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1572(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1572/1/012036

Toharudin, U. (2023). Peran Prior Knowledge dalam Self Regulation Siswa pada Materi Sistem Reproduksi. JURNAL BIOEDUKASI, 6(1), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.33387/bioedu.v6i1.5977

Zainudin, R. Binti, Nair, S. M., & Wider, W. (2023). Comparing the Effects of Graphic Organisers and Conventional Method on Students’ Writing Skills. World Journal of English Language, 13(7), 367–375. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n7p367

Published
2026-03-06
How to Cite
Anisah, G., Wulandari, P., Faqih, F. I., & Madzalan, J. B. (2026). Learning Path EXOOCO-2R Model in E-Module Based Reading and Writing Learning with Formative Assessment Tools. OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 19(1), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.19105/ojbs.v19i1.14810