Fostering Critical Thinking in Academic Writing through a Meta-Reflective Model: Integrating Self-Assessment and Inquiry-Based Learning
Abstract views: 50
,
PDF downloads: 19
Abstract
Academic writing in higher education requires students to demonstrate critical and reflective thinking skills. However, writing instruction rarely provides a systematic model that integrates metacognitive reflection into the writing process. This gap causes students to experience difficulties in linking self-reflection with the development of academic argumentation. This study aims to develop and examine the effectiveness of a meta-reflective writing model that integrates self-assessment and inquiry-based learning to enhance students’ critical thinking skills. The study employed a research and development (R&D) approach encompassing a preliminary study, model design, expert validation, limited trials, and effectiveness testing. The participants consisted of two expert validators and 20 students enrolled in a language education program. Validation results indicated that the model was highly feasible, with a mean score of 4.47. Findings from the limited trials demonstrated improvements in the quality of students’ written argumentation. Effectiveness testing using a one-group pretest–posttest design revealed a statistically significant increase in critical thinking scores from 22.1 to 44.4 (p < 0.001).These findings confirm that the meta-reflective writing model is effective, practical, and relevant as a pedagogical approach for strengthening critical thinking in academic writing, although further refinement of indicators at the pre-writing stage is still required.
Downloads
References
Abdalah, R., & Berger, J. (2025). Studies in Educational Evaluation Teacher Assessment Literacy, Formative Assessment Practices, and Their Perceived Efficacy in Tanzania : A Scoping Review. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 86 (June), 101496. 1-7.
Alshafie, M., Agha, L. Y., Nahass, L., Alameer, M. B., Samaan, J., Soqia, J., & Mohsen, S. (2025). Enhancing Skills for Scientific Writing: A Mixed-methods Study at the Faculty of Health Sciences, Damascus University. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 9 (July 2024), 100451, 1-6.
Alt, D., & Raichel, N. (2020). Reflective Journaling and Metacognitive Awareness: Insights from a Longitudinal Study in Higher Education. Reflective Practice, 21(2), 145-158.
Arifin, Z. (2025). The Effect of Inquiry-based Learning on Students ’ Critical Thinking Skills in Science Education : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 21(3), 1-24.
Beniche, M. (2023). The Correlation Between Critical Thinking Skills and Argumentative Writing Skills in Moroccan Higher Education: The Case of Languages, Letters, and Art Ibn Tofail University Kenitra. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 5(1), 212-229.
Branch, R. M. (2011). Instructional Design : The ADDIE Approach. In Instructional Design. Department of Educational Psychology and Instructional Technology University of Georgia 604.
Brock, R., & Park, W. (2024). Distinguishing Nature of Science Beliefs, Knowledge and Understandings: Towards Clarity and Coherence in Educational Goals Related to the Nature of Science. Science and Education, 33(3), 495-516.
Casado-Ledesma, L., Cuevas, I., & Martín, E. (2023). Learning Science Through Argumentative Synthesis Writing and Deliberative Dialogues: A Comprehensive and Effective Methodology in Secondary Education. Reading and Writing, 36(4), 965-996.
Chang, J. L., Hung, H. T., & Yang, Y. T. C. (2024). Effects of an Annotation‐Supported Socratic Questioning Approach on students’ argumentative writing performance and Critical Thinking Skills in Flipped Language Classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(1), 37-48.
Colomer, J. (2018). Evaluating Knowledge and Assessment-Centered Reflective-Based Learning Approaches. 1-16.
Darwin, Rusdin, D., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., Laksmi, E. D., & Marzuki. (2024). Critical Thinking in the AI Era: An Exploration of EFL Students’ Perceptions, Benefits, and Limitations. Cogent Education, 11(1). 1-18.
Gholam, A. (2019). Inquiry-Based Learning: Student Teachers’ Challenges and Perceptions. Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education, 10(2), 112-133.
Harsono, Amalia, L., Mukminin, A., Raji, M., & Anam, C. (2024). Utilizing Madura ’ s Cultural Heritage to Develop Critical Thinking Skills and Prevent Plagiarism in Scientific Writing. 8(1), 281-290.
Harsono, Hafsi, A. R., & Mukminin, A. (2024). Criticality in Self-assessment : writing Learning Innovations in Forming Critical Thinking. 14(3), 292-298.
Harsono, H., Suyitno, I., Harsiati, T., & Andajani, K. (2024). Developing Critical Thinkers : Integrating Inquiry with BMKII in Scientific Writing. 16(1), 451-466.
Huang, J., & Tan, M. (2023). The Role of ChatGPT In Scientific Communication: Writing Better Scientific Review Articles. American Journal of Cancer Research, 13(4), 1148-1154.
Humphries, A., Smith, C., & Choi, J. (2024). Beyond Language Barriers: One Educator’s Tale of Nurturing Critical Literacy for Academic Success in Refugee-Background Adult Learners. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 64(3), 467-482.
Katser, M. S., Veremis, B. M., Danciu, T. E., & Ramaswamy, V. (2025). Rallying for Reflection : Pilot Use of Rubric to Facilitate Reflection in Dental Education. European Journal of Dental Education. 1-8.
Lin, Y. (2025). A Reflection of Learners’ Motivation to Read, Self-assessment, Critical Thinking, and Academic Well-Being in Extensive and Intensive Reading Offline Instruction: A Focus on Self-Determination Theory. Learning and Motivation, 89(1), 1-11.
Loksa, D., Margulieux, L., Becker, B. A., Craig, M., Denny, P., Pettit, R., & Prather, J. (2022). Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Programming Education: Theories and Exemplars of Use. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 22(4), 1-31.
Lu, K., Pang, F., & Shadiev, R. (2021). Understanding The Mediating Effect of Learning Approach Between Learning Factors and Higher Order Thinking Skills In Collaborative Inquiry‑Based Learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(5), 2475–2492.
Malik, A. R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I. W., Suharti, S., Darwis, A., & Marzuki. (2023). Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Academic Essay: Higher Education Student’s Perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5 (September), 100296. 1-11.
Mannion, J. (2021). Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education Beyond the Grade : The Planning, Formative And Summative (Pfs) Model of Self-Assessment for Higher Education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-13.
Morris, D. L. (2025). Rethinking Science Education Practices : Shifting from Investigation- Centric to Comprehensive Inquiry-Based Instruction. Education Sciences, 15(1), 1-18.
Ou, A. W., Khuder, B., Franzetti, S., & Negretti, R. (2024). Conceptualising and Cultivating Critical GAI Literacy in Doctoral Academic Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 66(May), 101156. 1-16.
Putikadyanto, A. P. A., Wachidah, L. R., Sari, S. Y. (2024). Menciptakan Generasi Peduli Lingkungan: Inovasi Ekokurikulum Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Madura di SMP Pamekasan. Ghâncaran: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 47–62.
Qamariyah, S. N., Rahayu, S., Fajaroh, F., & Alsulami, N. M. (2021). The Effect of Implementation of Inquiry-based Learning with Socio- scientific Issues on Students’ Higher-Order Thinking Skills. 4(January), 210-218.
Radović, S., Hummel, H. G. K., & Vermeulen, M. (2023). The mARC Instructional Design Model for More Experiential Learning in Higher Education : Theoretical Foundations and Practical Guidelines. Teaching in Higher Education, 2517, 1173-1190.
Ramoni, D., Sgura, C., Liberale, L., Montecucco, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Carbone, F. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Scientific Medical Writing: Legitimate and Deceptive Uses and Ethical Concerns. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 127, 31-35.
Reyes, A. B., & Rodríguez-gonzalo, C. (2025). Collaboration in the Revision of a Piece of Writing : An Analysis of Group Revision Sessions with University Students. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 98-120.
Salvagno, M., Taccone, F. S., & Gerli, A. G. (2023). Can Artificial Intelligence Help for Scientific Writing? Critical Care, 27(1), 75, 1-5.
Sato, T. (2022). Assessing Critical Thinking Through L2 Argumentative Essays: An Investigation of Relevant and Salient Criteria from Raters’ Perspectives. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 9, 1-19.
Silva, J., Edmond, J., & Jauregui, C. (2025). Critical Thinking in the Classroom : Faculty Perspectives and Practices. Journal of Education and Learning, 14(3), 1-20.
Tang, L., Zhao, Y., Shen, K., Le, H., Juelich, T., Li, X., & Tan, S. (2024). Facilitating Learners ’ Self-Assessment During Formative Writing Tasks Using Writing Analytics Toolkit. June, 2822-2839.
Teng, M. F., & Yue, M. (2023). Metacognitive Writing Strategies, Critical Thinking Skills, And Academic Writing Performance: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Metacognition and Learning, 18(1), 237-260.
To, J., & Panadero, E. (2019). Peer Assessment Effects On The Self-Assessment Process of First-Year Undergraduates. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 920-932.
Trein, P., Fischer, M., Maggetti, M., & Sarti, F. (2023). Empirical Research on Policy Integration: A Review and New Directions. Policy Sciences, 56(1), 29-48.
Ülger, K. (2016). Öğrencilerin Yaratici Düşünme Ve Eleştirel Düşünme Becerileri Arasindaki Ilişki. Hacettepe Egitim Dergisi, 31(4), 695-710.
Ullrich, C., Ziegler, S., Armbruster, A., Wensing, M., & Klafke, N. (2024). Participant Observation for Inquiry-based Learning: A Document Analysis of Exam Papers From an Internship-Course For Master’ S Students In Health Services Research in Germany. BMC Medical Education, 24(1). 1-9.
Wale, B. D., & Bishaw, K. S. (2020). Effects of Using Inquiry-Based Learning on Efl Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(1), 1-19.
Wale, B. D., & Bogale, Y. N. (2021). Using Inquiry-Based Writing Instruction to Develop Students’ Academic Writing Skills. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 6(1), 1-16.
Wang, Q., Mousavi, A., & Lu, C. (2022). A Scoping Review of Empirical Studies on Theory- Driven Learning Analytics. Distance Education, 43(1), 6-29.
Yang, L., & Yang, M. (2023). Effects of Self-Assessment and Peer-Assessment Interventions on Academic Performance : A meta-analysis. 37(September 2022), 1-15.
Yu, C. (2023). Integrating Information Literacy and Academic Writing: Developing a Self-Assessment Scale of Information-Based Academic Writing. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(6). 1-17.
Yuendita, D., & Dina, D. (2024). Development of Chemical Literacy Book on Local Wisdom of Madura Culture Based on Augmented Reality (AR). 10(1), 346-359.
Zhang, Y., Qi, W., Xia, C., Sun, H., & Chen, L. (2025). Exploring the Effect of Cooperative Learning on Senior High School Students’ Critical Thinking in EFL Writing: An Intervention Study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 56(2), 101765, 1-15.
Copyright (c) 2026 GHANCARAN: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Ghancaran: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia uses an Open Access Policy under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors publishing in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Ghancaran Journal holds the copyright and grants the journal rights for first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a
The work is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which allows others to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any media or format and adapt, remix, change, and develop the material even for commercial purposes, as long as it is stated credit and license derivative works under similar terms. - Authors may make additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published work version.
- Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their websites) before and during submission, as doing so may lead to productive exchange.
