Millennial Parents’ Skepticism Toward Modern Parenting Approaches in Early Childhood Education
Abstract views: 0
,
PDF downloads: 1
Abstract
In the midst of shifting parenting paradigms, early childhood has become a critical arena where millennial parents must navigate between traditional expectations and modern approaches. This study aims to explore the skepticism of millennial parents toward modern parenting science and to examine the influencing factors, including personal experiences, traditional cultural norms, media exposure, and the psychological impacts that arise. Employing a qualitative approach with a case study method, data were collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and documentation involving fifteen millennial parents living in a traditional community setting. The findings reveal that childhood experiences serve as a primary reference point in evaluating the effectiveness of modern parenting approaches. Local cultural values that emphasize collectivism, physical closeness, and family hierarchy reinforce resistance to new parenting paradigms. Meanwhile, exposure to digital media provides broad access to parenting information but also leads to confusion due to the overwhelming and often contradictory content. This skepticism results in inconsistent parenting practices, social pressure, and internal conflicts that contribute to emotional fatigue and psychological strain among parents. The study concludes that skepticism toward modern parenting science is not a form of outright rejection, but rather an adaptive response to the mismatch between theoretical ideals and the socio-cultural realities faced by parents. Therefore, the dissemination of modern parenting approaches must be contextualized, participatory, and sensitive to the lived experiences and cultural values of millennial parents.
Downloads
References
Aguayo, D. S. (2025). Parents’ Perspectives of Culturally Responsive Practices for Teachers and School Administrators . Journal of Child and Family Studies, 10.1007/s10826-024-03002-9.
Akram, S. (2023). Bourdieu, Habitus and Field: A Critical Realist Approach. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Batini, F., Costanzo, M., & Giovannini, D. (2020). Reading Aloud and First Language Development: A Systematic Review. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 1–12.
Bourdieu, P. (1992). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: NY: Basic Books.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Carol Copple, S. B. (2013). Developmentally appropriate practice. Washington: National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC).
Choy, Y. N. (2024). Digital parenting and its impact on early childhood development: A scoping review. Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 22147–22187.
Chung, G. &. (2024). Parental burnout and self-efficacy in the context of intensive parenting norms. Early Child Development and Care, 215–230.
Dana Golden, L. E. (2021). Class, Education and Parenting: Cross-Cultural Perspectives. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 453–459.
Faircloth, C. (2021). Intensive parenting and the expansion of parenting. Sociology Compass, 10.1111/soc4.12874.
Fitroh, S. F. (2024). tnoparenting: Madurase Ethnic Women’s Parenting Viewed from the Perspective of Social Status. Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Undiksha, 1–8.
Fru-Ngongban, A. C. (2023). Eclectic Teaching Method: A Paradigm Shift in Contemporary Pedagogy for an Inclusive Classroom. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 1–6.
Gilmour, H. (2023). Raising Gen Alpha: How Millennial Parenting is Impacting the Next Generation. London: Beano Brain.
Hays, S. (2023). The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood: Revisited in the Digital Age. Journal of Family Studies, 45–62.
Herbert Goldenberg, Irene Goldenberg. (2013). Family Therapy: An Overview. Belmont, California: Cengage Learning.
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
Kislev, N., & Saguy, T. (2025). The Gendered Toy Choice (GTC): Validating a behavioral measure of gendered parenting . Frontiers in Psychology, 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1601339.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Labibah, K. N. (2024). arenting through social media: The information experience of young mothers in East Jakarta. Kawistara, 233–248.
Lansford, J. E. (2025). Theories of parenting and child development in different cultural contexts. Theory and Society, 851–865.
Martínez, P. D. (2020). Culturally Responsive-Sustaining Education. New York: NYU Metro Center.
Mary D. Salter Ainsworth, M. W. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mengis, M. J. (2004). The Concept of Information Overload: A Review of Literature and a Framework for Research. The Information Society, 325–344.
Miles, H. &. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Mughakali, A. &. (2025). Traditional vs Modern Approaches to Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE). Nagaland, India: St. Joseph University.
Mwamfupe, R. J. (2025). Examination of Parenting Then and Now: A Comparative Analysis of Traditional and . Global Scientific Journal, 1726-1738.
Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The Spiral of Silence: A Theory of Public Opinion. Journal of Communication, 43–51.
Patil, D., Gautam, G., & Jahagirdar, D. (2025). Parenting Style and Child Development: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. International Journal of Indian Psychology, DOI: 10.25215/1303.213.
Pinquart, M. (2017). Associations of Parenting Dimensions and Styles with Internalizing Symptoms in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 802–817.
Postmes, T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2022). Revisiting social identity theory in the age of social media. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101310.
Ria Novianti, S. N. (2023). Parenting in Cultural Perspective: A Systematic Review of Paternal Role Across Cultures. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 22–44.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The Cultural Nature of Human Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rosa, E. M., & Tudge, J. R. H. (2013). Urie Bronfenbrenner’s theory of human development: Its evolution from ecology to bioecology. ournal of Family Theory & Review, 243–258.
Sara Harknes, Charles M. Super. (2002). Culture and Parenting. Mahwah, New Jersey & London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Syed, A. A. (2025). Effectiveness and cultural adaptation of parenting interventions for South Asian families: A mixed-methods systematic review using Bernal’s ecological validity model. Children Journal.
Trisetiawati, J. F. (2025). The Local Wisdom of Madura in Ethnoparenting for Shaping Early Childhood Emotions. Nak-Kanak Journal of Child Research, 1-9.
Tristiyanto, E. Z. (2025). Cultural adaptation in parenting counseling programs: Exploring best practices for multicultural families in rural communities. Brebes: STAI Brebes.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Weiner, B. (1985). An Attributional Theory of Achievement Motivation and Emotion. Psychological Review, 548–573.
World Health Organization, United Nations Children’s Fund, World Bank. (2018). Nurturing care for early childhood development: A framework for helping children survive and thrive to transform health and human potential. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Zhou, Q. C. (2022). Parenting from a cultural and global perspective: A review of theoretical models and parenting research in diverse cultural contexts. In A. S. Morris, The Cambridge Handbook of Parenting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Copyright (c) 2026 Ansharul Fuqaha'

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-
The journal operates an Open Access policy under a Creative Commons 4.0 International license. The terms of the license are:
Share— copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt— remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License.that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal
2. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Jurnal Kiddo is licensed under a Creative Commons
n Access).











