TEACHERS STRATEGIES FOR FOSTERING CREATIVITY THROUGH THREE-DIMENSIONAL ARTS LEARNING IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Authors

  • Mutik Nur Fadhilah Universitas Islam Negeri Madura

https://doi.org/10.19105/mubtadi.v8i1.25127
Abstract views: 25 PDF downloads: 12

Keywords:

Teacher Strategies, Student Creativity, Three-Dimensional Arts

Abstract

This study aims to analyze teachers’ strategies in developing students’ creativity through three-dimensional visual arts learning in elementary schools. This research employed a qualitative approach with a descriptive case study design. The research population consisted of teachers and students involved in Arts, Culture, and Crafts (SBdP) learning at the elementary school level. The sample or research informants were selected purposively, consisting of an SBdP teacher or classroom teacher, fourth-grade students, and the principal or classroom teacher as supporting informants. The research instruments included observation guidelines, interview guidelines, and documentation sheets. Analysis involved data condensation, thematic coding, construction of finding matrices, cross-source comparison, and conclusion verification. Six interrelated strategies were identified: idea stimulation, exploration of media and materials, project-based learning, guidance during the creative process, motivation and appreciation, and evaluation of both process and product. These strategies supported fluency and flexibility; originality remained uneven, while elaboration became more visible after teacher scaffolding. Supporting conditions included student enthusiasm, guided freedom of expression, and accessible materials, whereas constraints included limited tools, time, practice space, and confidence. The study contributes a “guided creative autonomy” framework that links six teacher strategies to fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration, offering a practical basis for designing three-dimensional art learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amabile, T. M., Collins, M. A., Conti, R., Phillips, E., Picariello, M., Ruscio, J., & Whitney, D. (2018). Creatvty in context update to: The social psychology of creativity. In Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429501234

Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Ever-Broadening Conceptions of Creativity in the Classroom. In Nurturing Creativity in the Classroom. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316212899.008

Biddix, J. P., & Collom, G. D. (2023). Development and validation of a survey to identify predictors of choice and early departure among tennessee promise scholarship recipients. In Journal of College Student Development (Vol. 64, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2023.a901174

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Chapter four: thematic analysis. In APA handbook of research methods in psychology (Vol. 2).

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic Analysis: A practical guide to understanding and doing.

Carroll, J. B., & Guilford, J. P. (1968). The Nature of Human Intelligence. American Educational Research Journal, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/1161820

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research - International Student Edition. In SAGE Publication, Inc.

Fadhilah, M., Ahmad Fawaid, Ikha Yuliati, & Nailatur Rahmah. (2025). Development of a Madurese Local Wisdom–Based Learning Model Using a STEAM Integrative Approach to Improve Creativity and Innovation of Indonesian Elementary School Students. Al-Bidayah : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.14421/al-bidayah.v17i2.44294

Găbureanu, S., & Tripon, C. (2020). Critical thinking in stem learning. ELearning and Software for Education Conference. https://doi.org/10.12753/2066-026X-20-160

Guilford, J. P. (2021). Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York. SSRN Electronic Journal, September.

Hattie, J. (2008). Hattie 2009. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement, 3410.

Hayati, C., Khaleda Nurmeta, I., & Hamdani Maula, L. (2023). PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN BUBUR KERTAS TERHADAP KREATIVITAS SENI RUPA SISWA DI SEKOLAH DASAR. Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v8i1.7800

Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2016). Foundations and approaches to mixed method research. In First steps in research.

Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature.Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools. Improving School (SAGE Journals), 19(3).

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2007). Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber Tentang Metode-metode Baru. In UI Press.

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 : Insights and Interpretations. In OECD Publishing.

Pramudya, A. P. L., & Wijayanti, O. (2024). Strategi Guru dalam Mengembangkan Pembelajaran Seni Rupa Menumbuhkan Kreativitas Siswa Kelas IV di SD Negeri 2 Sokaraja Kulon, Banyumas. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Indonesia (JPPI), 4(2). https://doi.org/10.53299/jppi.v4i2.571

Torrance, E. P. (2011). Guiding creative talent. In Guiding creative talent. https://doi.org/10.1037/13134-000

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. In Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research (Vol. 53, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1177/109634809702100108

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28

Issue

Section

Articles