Bibliometric trends in CLIL for BIPA learning mapping publication, collaboration, and citation trends
Abstract views: 0
,
PDF downloads: 0
Abstract
Increased global attention to BIPA has encouraged the use of the Content Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) approach, but research on this topic is considered inconsistent and individualistic. This study aims to map publication trends, collaboration patterns, and the impact of CLIL research citations on BIPA using bibliometric analysis assisted by R Studio Biblioshiny. The results of the analysis show a significant surge in publications in 2021 due to pandemic adaptation, with Indonesia identified as a major knowledge center. However, critical findings reveal a clear gap in international collaboration, with publications dominated by Single Country Publications (SCP). This indicates a lack of research partnerships between Indonesian researchers and other countries. The study concludes that there is a need to transform individual initiatives into a strategic national agenda. Implicitly, policymakers need to prioritize cross-border research collaboration as an instrument of language diplomacy to strengthen the relevance and existence of BIPA globally.
Downloads
References
Alatas, S. F. (2003). Academic dependency and the global division of labour in the social sciences. Current Sociology, 51(6), 599–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921030516003
Altbach, P. G. (2004). Globalisation and the university: Myths and realities in an unequal world. Tertiary Education and Management, 10(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2004.9967114
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOI.2017.08.007
Atkinson, L. Z., & Cipriani, A. (2018). How to carry out a literature search for a systematic review: A practical guide. BJPsych Advances, 24(2), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2017.3
Bankar, R., Lihitkar, S. R., & Rohila, N. S. (2022). Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) and its application in academic libraries. Pearl : A Journal of Library and Information Science, 16(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-6922.2022.00006.7
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Basturkmen, H. (2025). Learning a specialized register: An English for specific purposes research agenda. Language Teaching, 58(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444823000472
Bhakti, Y. B., Simorangkir, M. R. R., Tjalla, A., & Sutisna, A. (2022). Kendala implementasi kebijakan Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) di perguruan tinggi. Research and Development Journal of Education, 8(2), 783–790. https://doi.org/10.30998/rdje.v8i2.12865
Bianco, J. Lo. (2007). Emergent china and chinese: Language planning categories. Language Policy, 6(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-006-9042-3
Blümel, C., & Schniedermann, A. (2020). Studying review articles in scientometrics and beyond: A research agenda. Scientometrics, 124(1), 711–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03431-7
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844150
Boyer, E. L. (1991). The scholarship of teaching from: Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. College Teaching, 39(1), 11–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.1991.10532213
Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.008
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
Busse, V. (2011). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. System, 39(1), 123–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.01.001
Crane, D., & Kaplan, N. (1973). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Physics Today, 26(1), 72–73. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3127901
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2021.04.070
Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change. Teachers college press.
Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA, 295(1), 90–93. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.1.90
Goris, J., Denessen, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2019). Effects of content and language integrated learning in Europe A systematic review of longitudinal experimental studies. European Educational Research Journal, 18(6), 675–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904119872426
Graham, K. M., Choi, Y., Davoodi, A., Razmeh, S., & Dixon, L. Q. (2018). Language and content outcomes of CLIL and EMI: A systematic review. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.2
Hamdiah, M. (2023). Komunikasi lintas budaya antara pengajar BIPA dan pemelajar Madagaskar. Jurnal Ilmiah Bina Bahasa, 16(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.33557/binabahasa.v16i1.2412
Herzog, C., Hook, D., & Konkiel, S. (2020). Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1162/QSS_A_00020
Hu, H., Said, N. E. M., & Hashim, H. (2023). Sustaining Content and Language Integrated Learning in China: A systematic review. Sustainability, 15(5), 3894. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15053894
Kampen, E. van, Admiraal, W., & Berry, A. (2018). Content and language integrated learning in the Netherlands: teachers’ self-reported pedagogical practices. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(2), 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1154004
Khiltukhina, E. (2021). Globalisation impact on the western and eastern cultures. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 3002–3006. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.365
Kuhn, T. S. (2002). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Kurdi, M. S., & Kurdi, M. S. (2021). Analisis bibliometrik dalam penelitian bidang pendidikan: Teori dan implementasi. Journal on Education, 3(4), 518–537. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v3i4.2858
Lillis, T. M., & Curry, M. J. (2011). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. Routledge.
Liu, N., Shapira, P., & Yue, X. (2021). Tracking developments in artificial intelligence research: Constructing and applying a new search strategy. Scientometrics, 126(4), 3153–3192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03868-4
MacDonald, H., Comer, C., Foster, M., Labelle, P. R., Marsalis, S., Nyhan, K., Premji, Z., Rogers, M., Splenda, R., Stansfield, C., & Young, S. (2024). Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1433
Marsh, D. (2002). CLIL/EMILE-The European dimension: Actions, trends and foresight potential. European Commission.
Maula, A. W., Fuad, A., & Utarini, A. (2018). Ten-years trend of dengue research in Indonesia and South-east Asian countries: A bibliometric analysis. Global Health Action, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1504398
Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3714-7
Nirmalasari, Y. (2022). Pengembangan bahan ajar menyimak berbasis kopi bagi pemelajar BIPA tingkat pemula. KLAUSA (Kajian Linguistik, Pembelajaran Bahasa, Dan Sastra), 6(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.33479/klausa.v6i1.564
Nugroho, A. (2020). Content and Language Integrated Learning practice in English for accounting course. IJET (Indonesian Journal of English Teaching), 9(2), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.15642/ijet2.2020.9.2.172-181
Onyancha, O. B., & Ocholla, D. N. (2022). Dispersion of ICT-related subject terms in information and knowledge management publications: A Bradford analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01189-2
Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.630064
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press.
Risdiany, H., & Herlambang, Y. T. (2021). Pengembangan profesionalisme guru dalam mewujudkan kualitas pendidikan di Indonesia. EDUKATIF: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(3), 817–823. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i3.434
Rumindah, R., Nasution, J., Budianti, D., Siswati, E., & Pujiyanti, P. (2025). Contextual approach in Indonesian Language Learning Model for Foreign Speakers (BIPA) to improve language competence skills. English Education Journal, 16(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.24815/eej.v16i1.43359
Shils, E. (1958). The intellectuals and the powers: Some perspectives for comparative analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 1(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500000049
Susanto, G., Pickus, D., Espree-Conaway, D., Suparmi, Rusiandi, A., & Noviya, H. (2024). Indonesian language policy and perspectives on its implementation in promoting Bahasa Indonesia as an international language. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2364511
Sutrisno, B., Sulaeman, A., Fasikh, M., & Yundayani, A. (2021). Kiat menjadi pegiat dan pengajar Bahasa Indonesia bagi penutur asing: Membidik potensi dan peluang. Jurnal Abdimas Prakasa Dakara, 1(2), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.37640/japd.v1i2.1031
Umagapi, J. L. (2017). Russia-ASEAN summit 2016: Improvement for the better strategic partnership. Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional, 13(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.26593/jihi.v13i2.2328.135-144
Villabona, N., & Cenoz, J. (2022). The integration of content and language in CLIL: A challenge for content-driven and language-driven teachers. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 35(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2021.1910703
Wagner, C. S., Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). The continuing growth of global cooperation networks in research: A conundrum for national governments. PLoS ONE, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0131816
Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.1136099
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Copyright (c) 2026 Khansa Wynonna Wijayakusumah, Rully Khairul Anwar, Yunus Winoto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ghancaran: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia uses an Open Access Policy under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors publishing in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Ghancaran Journal holds the copyright and grants the journal rights for first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a
The work is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which allows others to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any media or format and adapt, remix, change, and develop the material even for commercial purposes, as long as it is stated credit and license derivative works under similar terms. - Authors may make additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published work version.
- Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their websites) before and during submission, as doing so may lead to productive exchange.
