Ecofeminism in Indonesian fiction: Gender, land, and resistance in the era of environmental degradation
Abstract views: 0
,
PDF downloads: 0
Abstract
Ecocritical studies in Indonesian literature have developed rapidly; however, most still focus on the human–nature relationship without adequately integrating gender and postcolonial contexts into their analyses. This study aims to fill this gap by analysing the representations of the relationships between women, land, and power in Indonesian fiction through a postcolonial ecofeminist framework. The study focuses on three works: Tanah Tabu by Anindita S. Thayf, Saman by Ayu Utami, and Sihir Perempuan by Intan Paramaditha. This study used a qualitative approach with narrative and thematic analyses conducted through coding processes and comparative synthesis across texts. The results revealed three main patterns. First, women are represented as ecological victims in colonised and exploitative landscapes. Second, women appear as agents of resistance who negotiate power relations through their bodies and spirituality and through social practices. Third, women function as epistemic mediators who utilise local myths and spiritual knowledge to challenge the dominant ecological discourses. These findings show that literary works not only represent environmental crises but also produce alternative ecological knowledge that is grounded in local contexts. This study contributes to the development of ecofeminist studies by emphasising the importance of intersectional perspectives from Global South contexts in Indonesian literary studies and by expanding ecocriticism as a field of knowledge production and ecological resistance.
Downloads
References
Al - Qolbi, L. F. (2025). Postcolonial ecocritical perspectives in Indonesian literature. Journal of Literary Prose and Society, 2(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.59261/jlps.v2i1.13
Anjum, T. (2020). Ecofeminism: Exploitation of women and nature. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 5(4), 846–848. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.54.2
Antara Saha. (2024). Postcolonial ecofeminism in arundhati roy’s: The god of small things asiatic: IIUM Journal of English Language and Literature, 18(1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.31436/asiatic.v18i1.3214
Aswani, S., Lemahieu, A., & Sauer, W. H. H. (2018). Global trends of local ecological knowledge and future implications. PLOS ONE, 13(4), e0195440. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195440
Ayanian, A. H., Tausch, N., Acar, Y. G., Chayinska, M., Cheung, W.-Y., & Lukyanova, Y. (2021). Resistance in repressive contexts: A comprehensive test of psychological predictors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(4), 912–939. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000285
Bakhmetyeva, T. (2021). Ecofeminism and the carnivalesque: The art of cecylia malik and the spatial politics of women’s environmental activism. Feminist Formations, 33(2), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2021.0027
Banerjee, S. B., & Arjaliès, D.-L. (2021). Celebrating the end of enlightenment: Organization theory in the age of the anthropocene and gaia (and why neither is the solution to our ecological crisis). Organization Theory, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211036714
Bell, F. M., Dennis, M. K., & Brar, G. (2022). “Doing hope”: Ecofeminist spirituality provides emotional sustenance to confront the climate crisis. Affilia, 37(1), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109920987242
Darsono, Fahruddin, Birsyada, M. I., Judijanto, L., Muslim, A., Saefudin, A., & Saddhono, K. (2024). Environmental exploitation in the colonial period: An ecocritical analysis of pramoedya ananta toer’s buru quartet. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(8), 2455–2464. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1408.18
Dewi, N. (2020). River, resistance and women’s resilience in indonesian, malaysian and vietnamese fictions. LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra, 15(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v15i1.7487
Echavarren, J. M. (2023). The gender gap in environmental concern: support for an ecofeminist perspective and the role of gender egalitarian attitudes. Sex Roles, 89(9–10), 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01397-3
Efendi, A. N., Ahmadi, A., Indarti, T., & Kurniawati, E. (2025). Local voices, ecological narratives, and postcolonial struggles: An eco-postcolonialism reading of indonesian literature. The International Journal of Critical Cultural Studies, 24(1), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0055/CGP/v24i01/137-154
Foster, E. (2021). Ecofeminism revisited: Critical insights on contemporary environmental governance. Feminist Theory, 22(2), 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700120988639
Furlan Štante, N. (2023). Is there a place for pantheism in (post-)christian ecofeminist reconstruction of the god/goddess–world relationship. Religions, 15(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15010032
Hendrastiti, T. K., Kusujiarti, S., & Sasongko, R. N. (2023). The narratives of local women’s resilience in disaster and climate change: the voices of indonesian women in the watershed areas. The Indonesian Journal of Socio-Legal Studies, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.54828/ijsls.2023v3n1.4
I Gusti Ayu Andani Pertiwi, Ida Ayu Laksmita Sari, I Nyoman Suarka, & Sachiko Takasaki. (2025). Comparative voices of resistance: Gender and power in japanese and balinese novels (1989–2019). Jurnal Kajian Bali (Journal of Bali Studies), 15(2), 717–741. https://doi.org/10.24843/JKB.2025.v15.i02.p11
Karmakar, G., & Chetty, R. (2024). Episteme and ecology: Amitav ghosh’s the living mountain and the decolonial turn. South Asian Review, 45(3), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/02759527.2023.2206307
Lawrence, J. L., Altamirano-Jiménez, I., Daggett, C., MacGregor, S., Ray, E., Wiebe, S. M., Battersby, H., Rodekirchen, M., & Urquhart, H. (2025). Feminist approaches to environmental politics. Contemporary Political Theory, 24(1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-024-00707-y
Lima, V. (2021). From housing crisis to housing justice: Towards a radical right to a home. Urban Studies, 58(16), 3282–3298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098021995128
Liu, P. (2024). Laozi’s ecofeminist ethos: Bridging ancient wisdom with contemporary gender and environmental justice. Religions, 15(5), 599. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15050599
MacGregor, S. (2021). Making matter great again? Ecofeminism, new materialism and the everyday turn in environmental politics. Environmental Politics, 30(1–2), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1846954
Madhavi, B., & Nageswar Rao, Dr. K. (2023). Decolonizing nature: An in-depth analysis of ecofeminism. Journal of English Language and Literature, 10(02), 138–144. https://doi.org/10.54513/JOELL.2023.10214
Manion, C., & Shah, P. (2019). Decolonizing gender and education research: Unsettling and recasting feminist knowledges, power and research practices. Gender and Education, 31(4), 445–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2019.1596392
Maybom, C., & Funder, M. K. (2025). Women’s agency in environmental interventions: Navigating “resilient livelihoods” in Kenya. Geoforum, 164, 104343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104343
Mellor, M. (1996). The politics of women and nature: Affinity, contingency or material relation? Journal of Political Ideologies, 1(2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569319608420734
Mukono, D., & Faustine Sambaiga, R. (2022). Negotiating power from the margins: Encountering everyday experiences and contestations to REDD + in Southern Tanzania. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 5(4), 2132–2152. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486211052877
Muslimat, Rahman, F., Nurhayati, & Faisal, A. (2025). Women’s resistance to religious values in several indonesian novels of the 2000s: A feminist literary criticism review. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 15(8), 2651–2660. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1508.22
Oksala, J. (2018). Feminism, capitalism, and ecology. Hypatia, 33(2), 216–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12395
Oktarina, T. N., & Yulianti, A. (2022). The role of women in sustainable development and environmental protection: A discourse of ecofeminisme in indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Environmental Law and Sustainable Development, 1(2), 107–138. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijel.v1i2.58137
Pakasi, D. T., Hardon, A., Hidayana, I. M., & Rahmadhani, P. (2024). Gendered community-based waste management and the feminization of environmental responsibility in greater Jakarta, Indonesia. Gender, Technology and Development, 28(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2023.2300561
Paramaditha, Intan. (2017). Sihir perempuan. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Rauf, R., Muslimin, M. F., Ulya, A., & Gritantin, L. A. L. (2025). Discourse on gender: A linguistic analysis of body autonomy and patriarchal narratives in Wa Ndiu-Diu. Studies in English Language and Education, 12(1), 521–534. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i1.38267
Riessman, C. Kohler. (1993). Narrative analysis. Sage Publications.
Ryan, J. C. (2020). “The pained and silent song of a branch”: Ecological precarity in the poetry of Taufiq Ismail and Khairani Barokka. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 56(4), 488–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449855.2020.1762832
Santos, C. (2026). Connecting everyday resistance to staying put in the context of climate change. Climate and Development, 18(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2025.2489105
Shahvisi, A. (2016). Ecofeminism: feminist intersections with other animals and the earth. Journal of Gender Studies, 25(1), 112–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2015.1126400
Shrestha, R. K. (2025). Ecofeminist Interconnections and Rebellion in Richard Powers’ The Overstory. Historical Journal, 16(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.3126/hj.v16i1.76370
Supandi, D. P., Herlyna, H., & Mujani, S. (2025). Family conflicts in bawang putih and bawang merah movie: A feminist perspective. JELL (Journal of English Language and Literature) STIBA-IEC Jakarta, 10(02), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.37110/jell.v10i02.291
Thayf, A. S. . (2009). Tanah tabu. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Utami, Ayu. (2013). Saman. Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
Uysal, M. S., Saavedra, P., & Drury, J. (2024). Beyond normative and non‐normative: A systematic review on predictors of confrontational collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 63(3), 1385–1409. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12735
Van Wyk, T. (2022). Stuck between mother earth and a mother’s womb? on women, population policy and ecological sustainable development. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 78(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v78i4.7792
Wang, A. Y. (1999). Gender and nature: A psychological analysis of ecofeminist theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(11), 2410–2424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00118.x
Widianti, S. (2022). Compulsory heterosexuality in Indonesia: A literary exploration of the work of Ayu Utami. Religions, 13(10), 1002. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13101002
Yulisatiani, S., Suwandi, S., Suyitno, & Subiyantoro, S. (2020). Sustaining the environment: the wisdom of banyumas women in Ahmad Tohari’s novels. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v12n1.19
Copyright (c) 2026 Ria Kasanova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ghancaran: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia uses an Open Access Policy under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors publishing in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Ghancaran Journal holds the copyright and grants the journal rights for first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a
The work is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which allows others to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any media or format and adapt, remix, change, and develop the material even for commercial purposes, as long as it is stated credit and license derivative works under similar terms. - Authors may make additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published work version.
- Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their websites) before and during submission, as doing so may lead to productive exchange.












