Phubbing Behaviour: An Analysis of Triggers and the Impact on Social Interaction in the Digital Age
Abstract views: 0
,
PDF downloads: 1
Abstract
This study examines phubbing as a social phenomenon through the framework of politeness theory, focusing on how it triggers Face Threatening Acts (FTA) and the factors shaping individuals’ responses. Previous research has primarily explored the psychological and relational impacts of phubbing, limited attention has been given at how individuals negotiate face in naturally occurring interactions. To fill this gap, this study uses a qualitative method with semistructured interviews with 25 people aged 15-30 who have been phubbed. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify types of FTA and contributing factors. This study aims to explore the types of face threats caused by phubbing and the factors influencing individuals’ responses to such behavior. The findings show that phubbing can threats positive and negative face. Positive face threats involve feelings of being ignored and unappreciated, leading to indirect responses, while negative face threats involve irritation and disrupted autonomy, prompting more direct reactions. Additionally, the study identifies several key factors influencing responses, including relational closeness, interlocutor personality, prior consent, and conversational context. This study highlights phubbing as a face threat that provokes diverse response patterns influenced by interpersonal and situational variables. These results enhance comprehension of how individuals perceive and react to phubbing in routine communication.
Downloads
References
F. M. Schneider and S. Hitzfeld, “I Ought to Put Down That Phone but I Phub Nevertheless: Examining the Predictors of Phubbing Behavior,” Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1075–1088, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1177/0894439319882365.
O. Peleg and M. Boniel-Nissim, “Exploring the personality and relationship factors that mediate the connection between differentiation of self and phubbing,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 6572, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55560-1.
P. Ribino, “The role of politeness in human–machine interactions: a systematic literature review and future perspectives,” Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 56, no. S1, pp. 445–482, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10462-023-10540-1.
K. A. N. Hutabarat, K. S. Indriyani, and Latipun, “The Phubbing Phenomenon in Adolescents: Uncovering the Impact of Technology on Social Relationship Quality,” Social Science and Humanities Journal, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 5169–5177, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.18535/sshj.v8i10.1369.
M. A. Romadon, G. R. Affandi, and R. A. Paryontri, “The Influence Between Interpersonal Communication and Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) on Phubbing Behavior in Early Adults in Sidoarjo,” JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 4734–4744, May 2025, doi: 10.54371/jiip.v8i5.7862.
V. Franchina, M. Vanden Abeele, A. J. Van Rooij, G. Lo Coco, and L. De Marez, “Fear of Missing Out as a Predictor of Problematic Social Media Use and Phubbing Behavior among Flemish Adolescents,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 15, no. 10, p. 2319, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102319.
M. L. G. González, S. O. Hernández, and A. Cebollero‐Salinas, “FoMO and Socio‐Emotional e‐Competencies as Predictors of Media Multitasking, Phubbing and Cybergossip in University Students: Transnational Differences Between Mexico and Spain by Gender,” J. Community Psychol., vol. 53, no. 2, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1002/jcop.23183.
E. Capilla Garrido, T. Issa, P. Gutiérrez Esteban, and S. Cubo Delgado, “A descriptive literature review of phubbing behaviors,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 5, p. e07037, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07037.
E. CİZMECİ, “DISCONNECTED, THOUGH SATISFIED: PPHUBBING BEHAVIOR AND RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION,” THE TURKISH ONLINE JOURNAL OF DESIGN, ART AND COMMUNICATION, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 364–375, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.7456/10702100/018.
V. Chotpitayasunondh and K. M. Douglas, “The effects of ‘phubbing’ on social interaction,” J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 304–316, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1111/jasp.12506.
L.-C. Chi, T.-C. Tang, and E. Tang, “The phubbing phenomenon: a cross-sectional study on the relationships among social media addiction, fear of missing out, personality traits, and phubbing behavior,” Current Psychology, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 1112–1123, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02468-y.
T. Field, “Phubbing: a narrative review,” Journal of Psychology & Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 274–280, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.15406/jpcpy.2024.15.00792.
M. C. Doğru, R. M. Öge, S. A. Satici, and M. E. Deniz, “Trust and Romantic Relationship Quality as Serial Mediators of Link Between Partner Phubbing and Relationship Satisfaction,” Psychol. Rep., Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1177/00332941251335603.
M. Vanden Abeele, “The Social Consequences of Phubbing,” in The Oxford Handbook of Mobile Communication and Society, R. Ling, L. Fortunati, G. Goggin, S. S. Lim, and Y. Li, Eds., Oxford University Press, 2020, pp. 157–174. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190864385.013.11.
V. Chotpitayasunondh and K. M. Douglas, “How ‘phubbing’ becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 63, pp. 9–18, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.018.
J. K. Burgoon, “Interpersonal Expectations, Expectancy Violations, and Emotional Communication,” J. Lang. Soc. Psychol., vol. 12, no. 1–2, pp. 30–48, Mar. 1993, doi: 10.1177/0261927X93121003.
M. E. David and J. A. Roberts, “Investigating the impact of partner phubbing on romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction: The moderating role of attachment anxiety,” J. Soc. Pers. Relat., vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 3590–3609, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1177/0265407521996454.
F. Bargiela-Chiappini, “Face and politeness: new (insights) for old (concepts),” J. Pragmat., vol. 35, no. 10–11, pp. 1453–1469, Oct. 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00173-X.
L. Kelly, A. E. Miller-Ott, and R. L. Duran, “Phubbing friends: Understanding face threats from, and responses to, friends’ cell phone usage through the lens of politeness theory,” Commun. Q., vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 540–559, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1080/01463373.2019.1668443.
P. and L. S. Brown, Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. cambridge , 1987.
J. Sun and J. A. Samp, “‘Phubbing is happening to you’: examining predictors and effects of phubbing behaviour in friendships,” Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 2691–2704, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2021.1943711.
S. P. Chand, “Methods of Data Collection in Qualitative Research: Interviews, Focus Groups, Observations, and Document Analysis,” Advances in Educational Research and Evaluation, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 303–317, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.25082/AERE.2025.01.001.
V. Clarke and V. Braun, “Thematic analysis,” J. Posit. Psychol., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 297–298, May 2017, doi: 10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613.
A. Miller-Ott and L. Kelly, “The Presence of Cell Phones in Romantic Partner Face-to-Face Interactions: An Expectancy Violation Theory Approach,” South. Commun. J., vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 253–270, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1080/1041794X.2015.1055371.
J. Knausenberger, A. Giesen-Leuchter, and G. Echterhoff, “Feeling Ostracized by Others’ Smartphone Use: The Effect of Phubbing on Fundamental Needs, Mood, and Trust,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.883901.
Copyright (c) 2026 Hanum Aisya Ranie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Authors
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
