Perbedaan Qira’āt Menurut Sarjana Orientalis dan Muslim dan Implikasinya terhadap Penafsiran

Rohmansyah

doi:10.19105/revelatia.v6i1.18913

Rohmansyah Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

https://doi.org/10.19105/revelatia.v6i1.18913

Abstract views: 26 ,

pdf downloads: 27

Keywords: qira'āt difference, Orientalist Scholars, Muslim Scholars, Implication, interpretation

Abstract

One of problem discussed among scholars including orientalists is the difference in qira'at which has implications for interpretation in various aspects. This study aims to explain some opinions of orientalist scholars and Muslim scholars in response to the difference in qira'at. In addition, the study aims to see and analyze the implications of the difference in qira'at in several interpretations. The research method used is a qualitative method based on library research data with a descriptive-analytical approach. The findings of this study state that according to orientalists, the difference in qira'at will cause contradiction and chaos in determining the law. Meanwhile, according to Muslim scholars, differences in qira'at are a form of variation that will not alter the legal substance of the Quran. Besides that, there will be no conflict, change, or even chaos, because the Prophet conveyed qira'at according to the dialects of each tribe and nation. However, the difference in qira'at will have implications for four things, namely theological problems, fiqhiyah problems, gender equality problems, and miracle of the Qur’an itself.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adz-Dzahabi, Muhammad Husain. At-Tafsir Wa Al-Mufassirun. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 2000.

AF, Hasanudin. Anatomi Al-Qur’an: Perbedaan Qira’at Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Istinbat Hukum Dalam Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1995.

Al-Ashfahani, Al-Raghib. Mu’jam Mufradat Al-Fazh Al-Qur’an. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, 2008.

Al-Bukhāri, Muhammad bin Ismāil. Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhāri. Vol. 4. Beirūt: Dār Ibnu Kaṡīr, 2002.

Al-Jazari, Muḥammad bin Muḥammad. An-Nasyr Fī Qirā’āt Al-Asyar. Al-Madinah al-Munawwarah: Al-Mamlakah al-Arabiyyah al-Su’ūdiyyah, 1435.

Al-Qaṭṭān, Mannā’ Khalīl. Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Qur’an. Bogor: Pustaka Litera AntarNusa, 2007.

Al-Zarkasyi, Badruddin Muhammad bin Abdillah bin Bahadir. Al-Burhan Fi Ulum Al-Qur’an. Kairo: Dar al-Turats, n.d.

Al-Zuhaili, Wahbah. Wahbah Al-Zuhaili, Al-Tafsīr Al-Munīr Fī Al-Aqīdah Wa Al-Syarī’ah Wa Al-Manhaj. Damaskus: Dār al-Fikr, 2009.

Ash-Shabuni, Muhammad Ali. At-Tibyan Fi Ulum Al-Quran. Pakistan: Maktabah al-Busyra, 2011.

Ath-Thabari, Abu Ja’far Muhammad bin Jarir. Tafsir Ath-Thabari Al-Musamma Bi Jami’i Al-Bayan Fi Ta’wil Al-Qur’an. Vol. 24. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, 1999.

Goldziher, Ignaz. Mazhab Tafsir Dari Klasik Hingga Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: eLSAQ Press, 2010.

Halimah, B. “Perbedaan Qira’at Dan Pengaruhnya Dalam Istinbath Hukum.” Al_Risalah 19, no. 1 mei (2019): 97–98.

Hidayatulloh, Miftah Khilmi. “Problematika Kajian Al-Qur’an Di Era Modern: Studi Pemikiran ‘Abīd Al-Jābirī.” Journal of Qur’Ᾱn and Hadῑth Studies 9, no. 1 (2020): 42–60. http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/journal-of-quran-and-hadith/article/view/13389.

Hilmi, Ahmad Hulaimi. “Qirâ’ât Perspektif Ignaz Goldziher (Studi KritikTerhadap Pemikiran Orientalis.” Studia Qur’anika 1, no. 1 (2023): 1–28.

Ismail, Ulfan Huda, Nabil Ahmed Tarmom, and Wildan Fata Mubarok. “Pengaruh Ikhtilaf Al Qira’at Al Mutawatirah Dalam Surah Maryam Ayat 19.” AL KARIMA 8, no. 2 (2024): 158–75.

Jannah, Aqilatul. “Qirā’āt Ibnu Katsir Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Tafsir.” Jurnal Islam Spiritual 9, no. Pemikiran Islam dan Tasawuf (2023): 169.

Kaelan. Metode Penelitian Agama Kualitatif Interdisipliner. Yogyakarta: Paradigma, 2010.

Latif, Hilman. “Perbedaan Qira’ah Dan Penetapan Hukum.” Sulesana 8, no. 2 (2013): 65–79.

Manẓūr, Ibnu. Lisān Al-’Arab. Beirūt: Dār Iḥyā’ At-Turaṡ al-Arabi, 1999.

Meleong, Lexy J. Metodologi Penelitan Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2017.

Muhammad ’Abdul Adzīm Al-Zarqānī. Manāhil Al-Irfān Fi Ulūm Al-Qur’an. Beirūt: Dār al-Fikr, 1915.

Muhammad Mustafa al-A’zami. Sejarah Teks Al-Qur’an Dari Wahyu Sampai Kompilasi. Jakarta: Gema Insan, 2005.

Mustofa, H. “Implikasi Keragaman Qira’at Al-Qur’an Terhadap Tafsir Dan Istinbath Hukim.” Al-Bayan: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir 8461, no. 7 (2022): 1.

Mustopa. “Qira’at Diversity in Islamic Family Law Verses: Implications for Indonesian Marriage Law.” Samarah 8, no. 2 (2024): 1257–79. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i2.23513.

Pane, Ismail. “Analisis Qirā’at Sab’ah Pada Kitab Tafsir Al-Munîr Karya Wahbah Al-Zuhailī.” Al-Fikra 22, no. 1 (2023): 33–42. https://doi.org/10.24014/af.v22i1.18629.

Shihab, M. Quraish. Tafsir Al-Misbah: Pesan, Kesan Dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2006.

Siregar, Parluhutan. “Peran Teori Qira’at Dalam Memahami Ayat-Ayat Relasi Gender.” RUSYDIAH: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam 1, no. 1 (2020): 84–98. https://doi.org/10.35961/rsd.v1i1.131.

Soim, Moh. “Dinamika Qira’atologi: Menelaah Perbedaan Qiraah Mutawatir Dan Syadz Serta Pandangan Ulama Tentang Rukunnya.” Al-Munir: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir 6, no. 2 (2024): 1–23.

Taimiyyah, Syaikh al-Islām Ibnu. Bayān Ad-Dalīl ‘ala Buṭlāni at-Taḥlīl. Bagdad: al-Maktabah al-Islāmi, 1988.

Thobroni, Muhammad Esa Prasastia Amnesti; Ahmad Yusam. “Pengaruh Perbedaan Qira’at Shahih Dalam Penafsiran Al- Qur’an Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Hukum.” Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (Japendi) 2, no. 9 (2021): 1572–81.

Ummah, Feni Tamimul. “DAMPAK QIRA’AT TERHADAP PENAFSIRAN Studi Analisis Farsh Al-Hurūf Dalam Tafsir Marāh Labīd Surah Al- Baqarah.” AL ITQAN 10, no. 1 (2024): 45–84.

Yusof, M. Jismani Yusoff; Nor Hafizi. “Analisis Perbandingan Kaedah Jam‘ Al-Qira’at Dalam Karya Al-Tuhfat Al-Mardiyyah Dan Al-Minah Al-Ilahiyyah Berdasarkan Qira’at Al-Sab’ Tariq Al-Shatibiyyah.” Malaysian Journal for Islamic Studies 8, no. 1 (2024): 57–67.

Zaman, Akhmad Roja Badrus. “Menyoal Kritik Orientalis Terhadap Qirā’at: Studi Kritis Terhadap Pemikiran Arthur Jefrey Mengenai Ragam Bacaan Al-Qur’an.” Ilmu Ushuluddin 7, no. 2 (2020): 185–94. https://doi.org/10.15408/iu.v7i2.16583.